Restoration of an upper premolar

The patient highlighted in this article was a 20-year-old female with a clear medical history. She presented with a missing upper premolar which had been extracted two months earlier due to dental caries. The extraction was carried out with a view to replacing this tooth with a dental implant.

A standard plus aesthetic dental implant was placed under local anaesthetic in the region and allowed to heal for the initial eight-week post-op period as recommended by the placement protocol.

The healing cap was simply unscrewed and the soft tissues appeared healthy. A screw impression coping was used to record the implant’s position and an Impregum impression taken along with a wax wafer bite registration and opposing arch alginate impression. From this, the laboratory was able to use a standard implant abutment (Figs 1 & 2) and fabricate a metal alloy bonded to porcelain crown.

The laboratory work was fabricated on a plaster model (Figs 3, 4 and 5) with a soft tissue representation. The crown was cement retained and the abutment screw retained. The surgical implant placement was central and allowed axial loading of the fixture and also a favourable gingival profile.

The components were then transferred from the laboratory model (Fig 6). The abutment was tightened to 35NM and the crown cemented with a zinc Oxide/Eugenol based cement.

The final result produced an aesthetically predictable restoration (Figures 7 &8). A Straumann implant was favoured in this case as it required a simple placement protocol and the aesthetic work was carried out entirely within the laboratory. No abutment preparation was required with this system, making restoration simpler and producing good aesthetics.

Get the most out of your membership by subscribing to Dentistry CPD
  • Access 600+ hours of verified CPD courses
  • Includes all GDC recommended topics
  • Powerful CPD tracking tools included
Register for webinar
Add to calendar